MIPS 2021 reporting, MIPS Qualified Registries, MIPS Reporting 2021, MIPS 2020 feedback, Medicare and Medicaid Services, MIPS payment adjustments, MIPS score, MIPS consultants

QPP MIPS 2020 Feedback Is Available for Review

You heard it right. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has officially released the feedback for the MIPS Reporting 2021 period. Now clinicians have the chance to review their final score and the MIPS payment adjustments, which they still receive in 2022.

Why This Review Matters?

This review is an opportunity where you are more than welcome to look into details and check if there is any issue or error in the processing of your submitted data.

MIPS data reflects your performance for the whole year, and clinicians pay attention to this process throughout. They spend time understanding the reporting requirements that MIPS CMS mentions. However, it is a hectic process and requires careful diligence. A MIPS Qualified Registry becomes important in this regard.

Why it’s High Time to Consult a Reporting Registry?

MIPS consultants will give you the ease to cater to the administrative load without any stress. CMS has tough requirements and tougher reporting details that cannot be missed. The resources seem to provide the professional documentation that ultimately adds up to your score.

Now, when there are a few months left for MIPS 2021 reporting, MIPS Qualified Registries are also gearing up to manage their clients. Physicians! They are the most suitable or convenient option among the data submission methods because they offer reliability and transparency in all matters.

Another plus point that such associations can offer is the accuracy of measure selection that safeguards the interests of clinicians.

So, it is better to review 2020 feedback and look for all the errors that somehow reflected on your score wrongfully.

You Can Call For a Review until October 01, 2021

Now, when you can go through the MIPS data and review your performance and payment adjustments, you can know about the payment adjustments that you will be receiving in 2022.

And, if there happen to be any errors, clinicians can apply for targeted review to CMS for reassessment and readjustment. However, you have a deadline until October 01, 2021, 8:00 PM (ET).

The good news is if you were already in touch with the MIPS consultants, you would have no problem in recognizing areas where CMS misinterpreted your data. You would already access how much MIPS score and what percentage of incentives you should get.

QPP MIPS 2021, MIPS Qualified Registry, MIPS Quality measures, MIPS incentives, MIPS consultants

Get up to 5% Incentives from CMS as Payment Adjustments in 2023

QPP MIPS 2021 is a chance to target up to 5% Medicare payment incentives. So, if you want your medical practices to be financially strong, here is an opportunity to leverage.

Do you know CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) updates performance categories every year? Starting from the Quality category that was 45% of the total MIPS score in the previous year is now set at 40%. The Promoting Interoperability (PI) category is set at 25%, Improvement Activities (IA) at 15%, and Cost category is set at 20%.

Avoid Up to 9% Penalty by Successfully Submitting MIPS 2021 Data

MIPS 2021 has brought many opportunities for financial gains, which is explained in the latter paragraphs. However, even you don’t want to earn incentives and think that your medical practice is doing great! Think again!

According to CMS, medical practices, which are failed to report MIPS data for 2021, will have to face serious repercussions. There is a set percentage of 9% penalty that MIPS eligible clinicians might bear for “not reporting data”.

Moreover, you could also lose the chance to get featured in the “Physicians Portal” through which you can cash on many growth prospects. Thus, ignoring MIPS 2021 is not an option.

It is a Chance to Improve RCM!

Especially amidst the peak pandemic hours, the healthcare industry has suffered significantly. There were lesser resources and more patients. All thanks to the healthcare workers, they have managed everything quite impressively.

Where we are commending the roles of healthcare workers, we should also realize that medical practices have suffered on the financial front. They delivered more than their capacity and actually incurred the loss.

So, when there is an opportunity to compensate for the losses, why not utilize it!

P3Care, being the MIPS Qualified Registry, for five years now, has been helping eligible clinicians to report specialty-specific MIPS Quality measures to CMS. The outcomes for our physicians have been quite fruitful.

Not only they managed to avoid a penalty but also targeted MIPS incentives respectively. You can also be a part of the list whose name comes in a good light in the Physicians Portal.

Stakes Are High with MIPS 2021

Yes! The stakes are quite high with QPP MIPS reporting 2021. The reporting requirements have changed. Some quality measures got topped out, while some are the new additions to the list. No doubt, there is a lot of administrative load on eligible clinicians that need laser-focused attention. Otherwise, there will be no point in catering to this incentive payment program with below-average performance.

MIPS consultants allow you to cater to all such worries with their experience and latest resources. So the final verdict is if you want to receive up to 5% incentives as payment adjustments in 2023, it is time to plan and implement successful strategies.

medical billing experts, medical billing services, Medical billing companies, medical billing

Payment Integrity Audits Proves to be a Burden for Clinicians

A study conducted by Change Healthcare highlighted a serious matter about the payment integrity audits. It stated that payment audits cost physicians up to $1 million for administrative expenses each year.

Clinicians who consult a third party for medical billing services have lesser data to handle in general. However, the effect remains the same. Not just clinicians have to compile claims and send them to the payers, but the additional auditing load adds to the pressure. Moreover, it also dents the relationship between both physicians and insurance companies, government or private.

So, What Is the Solution?

A pre-submission notification process for claims seems a suitable solution. Medical billing companies can be of great help in this regard. They can stay in touch with the payers to know the potential errors before the claim submission. It certainly improves the accuracy of claims and reduces potential errors.

Moreover, the risk of post-payment integrity audit is also reduced.

Technology Can Help Win This Game

Technology is a savior when it comes to assisting in operations. To reduce the burden of data administration, medical practices and medical billing experts can use technology. Moreover, a significant amount of time is also reduced.

Physicians say that it is a huge step in minimizing the risk of post-payment integrity audits. We can also see a reduction in associated costs.

Why Post Payment Audit Is An Issue?

Many payers fail to understand that why post-payment integrity audit is an issue with physicians when it helps with financial stability.

However, the truth is ensuring payment accuracy is costly. A regular audit by the payers or medical billing company applies to the utilization of codes, accuracy of bills, quality of healthcare, and the incurred costs and efforts.

What is concerning that up to four out of ten providers do not know that post-payment auditing is costing their medical practice.  Moreover, it is not just about the administrative load and cost, but many physicians have negative experiences with these programs.

Most requests for the audits concern the correct billing of clinical procedures. However, the majority of cases end up in dissatisfaction.

Conclusion

A better strategy for clinicians or their hired medical billing companies is to pay more attention to the pre-claim submission process. With lesser chances to mess up, the need for post-payment integrity audits will reduce.

Medical billing services, medical billing and coding, healthcare industry, CMS released, healthcare service providers, COVID-19 Antibody

CMS Released Billing Codes for COVID-19 Antibody

Medical billing services have always been an important part of the healthcare industry. Also, with the corona pandemic, these services are now crucial to run the revenue cycle.

COVID-19 has tested our every ability, and our healthcare industry is coping with the surge of patients with limited resources. Meanwhile, where there are other administrative issues, CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) is facilitating on the medical billing and coding front.

The New Update about the COVID Antibody

Most of you must know that COVID-19 antibodies would be officially available for everyone from next year. Tests have been running, and vaccine shots are being injected into a group of people to create awareness. To administer the process of medical billing services, CMS released two new codes to document antibodies.

Under the HCPCS (Healthcare Common Procedural Coding System), now physicians can use the following codes:

  • Q0243 for the injection of 2,400 milligrams of Regeneron’s investigational monoclonal antibody therapy cocktail
  • M0243 for intravenous infusion and post-administration monitoring

The new codes reflect on the investigational monoclonal antibody therapy from Regeneron. FDA approved this therapy, and it is authorized for the mild-to-moderate COVID-19 patients with a chance of hospitalization.

Instructions from CMS

CMS has instructed healthcare service providers and medical billing services that as long as they document antibodies as per the guidelines, Medicare will pay for them. Moreover, the payment program will also reimburse medical practices for the other infusions the way they do for COVID-19 vaccines.

The payment allowances for the COVID injections have already been in effect since November 21. CMS further explains that the reimbursement for initial injection is low mostly because physicians do not expect to bear the cost for Regeneron’s therapy.

Initial Antibody Doses are Free

HHS (United States Department of Health and Human Services) is already providing the initial antibodies for free (as per the COVID infected population in each region). Regeneron has signed a contract with the pharmaceutical companies to distribute between 70,000 and 300,000 doses all over the states.

CMS also has mentioned that Medicare will not reimburse for any of the government-allotted free antibody doses. However, they will inform (physicians & medical billing services) beforehand when physicians can expect to bear the expenses.

Conclusion

The therapies are expected to overcome the potential patient visits to hospitals. Moreover, their Medicare coverage will ease the process of COVID treatment, and medical billing services can better cater to physicians’ finances. Having said that, the healthcare industry is expected to face hurdles against adequate access to antibodies.

Medical billing services, medical billing and coding services, EHR system, healthcare services, health IT leaders, medical billing services process

U.S. Clinicians Spend 90 Minutes on Medical Billing Services

Recently the Journal of the American Medical Association and Medical Care published a report stating the time spent on EHRs by clinicians of several countries. The study particularly focused on the physicians, who prefer in-house medical billing services.

Research Background

The JAMA study compared the data of U.S. clinicians to those in Canada, Western Europe, Northern Europe, Middle East, and Oceania. Looking into their data, it was evident that clinicians in the USA spend more time in data management via EHRs (Electronic Healthcare Records) than other physicians do.

It was Harvard and Stanford University that collected the metadata of 371 ambulatory care health systems all around the world. All healthcare service providers with scheduled patient appointments and advanced practice practitioners participated in this study.

Statistically, U.S. clinicians spend ninety minutes on average for medical billing and coding services. While clinicians of other countries spend just an hour/day. Moreover, the Medical Care study also mentioned that it generally took 1.2 minutes more in the scheduled examination appointment for the primary healthcare services.

What to Take Away From This?

Both these studies suggest the inconsistencies in the EHR system and the inefficiency of clinicians for medical billing services. This time also lags other administrative tasks such as scheduling appointments.

The timestamps of the EHRs provided all the necessary data to review the time spent by physicians other than on patients.

The clinical activities included:

  • Notes
  • Orders
  • Clinical review
  • In-basket messages

Physicians’ data was judged based on the above-mentioned points.

It is also to consider that U.S. clinicians on average received thirty-four messages per day. Moreover, they spend a lot more time than the clinicians of other countries do on EHRs.

The Impact of Lagged Time on Patient Experience

The study also gave insights into the issues in appointment scheduling and patient experience. For Instance, short-time appointments are more likely to get delayed as compared to the longer ones. It is one of the major reasons that lead to burden down physicians. Ultimately, it also adds to poor communication with patients, resulting in unsatisfactory care quality.

Medical billing services are not clinicians’ forte. And, to help them in the process, it is necessary to lower down the administrative burden from their shoulders. That is why many physicians in the USA tend to outsource medical billing and coding services to others.

Administrative Load for Medical Billing Needs to Change

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association also analyzed that women clinicians have to spend more time on EHRs than male clinicians. The time difference is estimated to be thirty-three minutes. Thus, this study is a reflection of the efforts that female healthcare service providers put into their work.

Conclusion

All in all, this study pointed out the inaccuracies in the U.S. medical billing services process. The best option for physicians is to outsource the administrative data to a qualified company.

Whereas, health IT leaders need to come up with effective solutions that are cost-effective and time-efficient for everyone. Only then, our healthcare industry will be truly progressive.

Electronic Healthcare Records, healthcare industry, healthcare service providers, healthcare services, healthcare system, Medicare and Medicaid Services, MIPS eligible clinicians, MIPS quality score, QPP MIPS

Updates in Stark Law: What It Means for QPP MIPS?

CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) has revamped the Stark Law for healthcare service providers.

The upgraded law will have an impact on the volume and quality of healthcare services. Especially, QPP MIPS eligible clinicians can take notes and design strategies to improve patient satisfaction.

For those of you, who do not know about the Stark Law, here is its definition!

What is Stark Law?

This law prohibits physicians from self-referral, particularly in a situation, when a physician has a financial relationship with a patient and refers to another entity for the provision of designated health services (DHS).

The new laws will also influence the QPP MIPS quality score via a transparent referral process. Without a doubt, it is a great step towards an altogether progressive healthcare system.

Proposed Changes

  • CMS proposed changes that allow exceptions for/among certain physicians.
  • The final proposed rule also applies exceptions in some cases when a physician receives reimbursement for items or services from another clinician.
  • CMS also proposed flexibilities for the funds or donations extended to the cybersecurity technology and services.
  • Moreover, the existing exceptions for the EHR (Electronic Healthcare Records) data, products, and services are also modified.
  • The update in the Stark Law is expected to be effective from next year January 19, 2021.

The Stark Law, since its provision in 1989 was the same, and there were no updates since then. CMS says that these modifications are significant and will change the referral scenario in the healthcare industry.

Conclusion

The new changes strive to encourage clinicians to adopt quality-based healthcare practices as specified by the QPP MIPS without fearing Stark Law violations.

The exceptions are introduced to facilitate the reimbursement process and to improve coordination among different stakeholders in a legitimate manner.

CMS Update, healthcare system, MIPS 2020, MIPS Qualified Registry, MIPS data submission, MIPS incentives

CMS Announces A Decline of $15 Billion in Medicare Fee-For-Service Improper Payments

Both patients and physicians are in for a treat. A few days ago, CMS happily announced the continued decline in the Medicare Fee-For-Service improper payment rate.

It is a clear statement in the name of transparency. More importantly, it is the proper accreditation of taxpayer money and an effort to strengthen the Medicare program in general. Undeniably, such are the efforts that pave the way for a rewarding healthcare system.

If you see it in another manner, once you hold fraudulent activities to account, there is more to give to those who deserve it. It automatically translates into value for quality programs like the MIPS 2020 and for other value-based care programs. Through such strategic actions, we will cement the positive reflection of value-based programs, both materially and conceptually.

In fact, once CMS saves taxpayer money by stopping improper payments made on account of frauds, overpayments, and underpayments, it converts into quality care and fewer expenses for the common man.

Four Years of Remaining on Point Saves the Day

It was not an overnight thing, but it took four constant years to come to this point. CMS corrective measures led to an estimated $15 billion reduction in Medicare FFS improper payments in FY 2020. It was part of the agency’s action plans that helped reduce and prevent illegitimate payments over the years.

During this journey of consistency and hard work, the agency’s capacity to address risks improved substantially through group activities and interagency collaborations.

For a fact, it was the Trump administration that made a clear commitment to protect Medicare for our seniors. To achieve this purpose, we must ensure that frauds, abuse, and waste do not happen as they will rob the program of its efficacy, Ms. Seema Verma expressed in her brief talk.

The Trump administration doubled the efforts to protect taxpayer money, and this year’s continued reduction in Medicare FFS improper payments is a direct effect of those actions.

Historic Win for Taxpayers

The reduction in improper payment rate means a win for taxpayers. Their hard-earned money is safer this year by quite a margin from the previous year. Due to the constant efforts in this sector, in 2020, CMS managed to decrease the improper payment rate further down – to 6.27%. Back in FY 2019, this rate was 7.25%. It is the start of an era of taxpayer savings to ignite the flames of a flawless healthcare system.

The improper payment rate threshold has to be under 10%, and, rightly so, we live to see it become a reality. In the past four years, we made this progress under the Payment Integrity Information Act of 2019 for our present and future generations.

Progressive Areas

  • Home Health department saw improvements, including clarifying documentation requirements and raising awareness among providers through the Targeted Probe and Education program. The resulting situation was no less than incredible. It led to a $5.9 billion decrease in improper payments from 2016 to 2020.
  • Skilled Nursing Facility Claims was the other area that saw improvement. There was an approximate reduction of $1 billion in improper payments in the last year due to a policy shift. It happened due to an adjustment made to the supporting information for physician certification and recertification of the skilled nursing facility services. Moreover, CMS’ Targeted Probe and Educate programs reaped its fruits.

Healthcare costs are soaring as we speak, and they are going to increase going forward. According to an estimate, by 2026, one out of every five tax dollars will go into healthcare.

To have sustainable cost growth, CMS must continue to strive for a system that accepts only proper payments. Improper payments only destabilize the cost balance. Stating the obvious, they are illegal payments – intentional or otherwise – going against the sustainability of affordable healthcare. They also represent false spending of American taxpayer dollars; however, not all of them represent fraud. The definition of improper payments includes overpayments, underpayments, or payments made under insufficient information.

Action Plan

CMS has developed a five-tier program integrity plan to mark the agency’s approach to reducing improper payments while safeguarding its programs for future generations:

  1. Bring Bad Actors to Justice: CMS works alongside law enforcement agencies to bring people who have defrauded the system under law.
  2. Prevent Fraud Before It Happens: Rather than the costly and ineffective “pay & chase” model, CMS eliminates fraud proactively by reducing the opportunities to exploit vulnerabilities in healthcare.
  3. Mitigate Risks to Value-Based Programs: CMS continues to explore ways to identify and reduce integrity risks to value-based care programs. MIPS 2020 and Advanced Alternative Payment Models (APMs) are the two programs currently underway. With the help of experts in the healthcare community, their lessons learned, CMS pledges to run these programs smoothly.
  4. Reduce Provider Burden: It is in line with reducing providers’ burdens who make claim errors in good faith; CMS wants to assist them by giving them easier access to coverage and payment rules. In addition to that, CMS is educating them on compliance programs. P3 Healthcare Solutions becomes a part of this effort via MIPS data submission to CMS as a MIPS Qualified Registry.
  5. Leverage Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: CMS looks to leverage technology like AI and machine learning to allow the Medicare program to oversee compliance on claim submissions. It eventually calms the providers down, and taxpayers get to pay less.
QPP MIPS 2020 Reporting, CMS Update, healthcare system, eligible physicians, MIPS 2020 Reporting, MIPS 2020 data submission, MIPS 2020 data submission process

QPP MIPS 2020 Reporting Flexibilities amidst Pandemic

CMS (Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services) has proven to be an authority that addresses physicians’ concerns in an effective manner.

With the pandemic situation going on, the pressure on physicians only got worse, which the authority took notice of.

Flexibilities for MIPS Eligible Physicians

To ease the administrative load for MIPS 2020 data submission, CMS announced to facilitate clinicians amidst the corona pandemic.

CMS announces QPP MIPS reporting Relaxations for 2020

Extreme & Uncontrollable Circumstances Application

Many medical practices have been affected by the surging corona positive cases.

Such practices, whose conditions have gotten worse during this period can apply for “Extreme and Uncontrollable Circumstances Application”.

In case of acceptance of this application, CMS will reweight any or all MIPS performance categories. However, the applicants have to provide a solid reason for this relaxation and justify the impact of COVID-19 on their practice.

This is done in order to offer relief for QPP MIPS 2020 data submission.

COVID-19 Clinical Trials for Improvement Activities (IA)

Now, under the MIPS program, eligible clinicians can also report COVID-19 related data for Improvement Activities (IA).

Any of the following conditions are to be fulfilled in order to participate in MIPS 2020 IA clinical trials.

  1. The interested clinicians must submit data to a relevant platform for research purposes, then, they can apply for the clinical trial.
  2. The interested physicians must submit COVID-19 patients’ data to a clinical data registry for research purposes without any change.

One thing worth mentioning here is that CMS has clearly stated in its notification that no data from Jan 1, 2020, through June 30, 2020, will be used to excuse the MIPS 2020 reporting requirements.

This restriction applies to all Medicare Quality Reporting programs as well as the Value-Based Purchasing programs.

Thus, data related to respective dates will be served to reduce the administrative load.

Visit our website for more information on QPP MIPS 2020 relaxations.

CMS, medical billing company, medical billing services, healthcare services, healthcare solutions

CMS Plans to Expand RSNAT All Across America

CMS (The Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services) works for quality care and optimized performance in the healthcare industry. The healthcare industry leaders are focusing on every aspect and taking measures step-by-step to simplify operations.

Apart from announcing advancements in medical billing services and other healthcare operations, they also consider aspects of non-emergent care.

Recently, CMS announced to expand Medicare Prior Authorization Model for Repetitive, Scheduled Non-Emergent Ambulance Transport (RSNAT) across all America.

According to CMS, before the expansion process, RSNAT Prior Authorization Model will test the need for prior authorization of services.

What will be the outcome if outsourcing medical billing services seek approval before the service is rendered or before they send the due claim to the payer? Will it save cash for Medicare while trying to achieve quality healthcare for repetitive, scheduled non-emergency ambulance transportation?

Let’s find out.

CMS implemented this model in several states of America

An Overview

Such as New Jersey, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland, Delaware, and the District of Columbia during different years to test out its implications.

The results were quite astonishing and encouraging to say the least. The quality of care and easy access to essential services were maintained as expected. Statistics show that Medicare Prior Authorization Model for Repetitive, Scheduled Non-Emergent Ambulance Transport saved around $650 million over four years.

The Need to Implement a New Model

Medical billing services used to face problems related to improper/inconsistent Medicare payments for non-emergent ambulance transports. There was a much-needed room for a new payment model that promotes cost efficiency and counters risks related to payments.

And, CMS wants to ensure proactive measures that minimize fraudulent activities.

Is the New Model Successful?

healthcare industry, medical billing services, CMS announced, outsourcing medical billing, healthcare system, medical billing experts, medical billing outsourcing companies, medical billing companies

The first evaluation report of this program came under analysis in 2018 and based on that, CMS is hopeful to expand it nationwide to curb down Medicare Spending. The recently released second evaluation report also highlighted that the use of RSNAT is reduced by 63% and its respective spending is reduced by 72% overall. (The report results were concerning the end-stage renal disease and/or severe pressure ulcers during the first four years of the model.) However, it supported the previous assumption that it is safe to implement this program everywhere. There was also no evidence against this system that reflected poor healthcare quality.

CMS has made clear that across the board accountability, lesser loopholes for frauds, simplified solutions, and expanses in check will make a progressive healthcare system. Moreover, with the new plan, medical billing services, physicians, and patients, all will be benefitted in one way or another.

CMS administrator, Seema Verma says that although medical billing experts complain about the complexity of prior authorization. But, with a proper plan of action and accurate deployment of the model, Medicare can ensure that its requirements are met even before the start of the service.

One more advantage of this system is that billing experts on behalf of physicians don’t have to indulge in extra administrative work afterward.

Henceforth, the program will continue to run in the currents states although they were expected to end this year. But, the success of the new model of non-emergency ambulance transportation changed the whole view.

CMS will release new guidelines regarding the expansion in every state. The model will remain the same as the existing model.

It is expected that medical billing outsourcing companies will find this new model accommodating with respect to maintaining cost.

Healthcare, Medical Billing Companies, Medical billing outsourcing companies, Medical Billing Services, Surprise medical billing

HHS Says: No Surprise Bills for COVID Patients

HHS – The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) reserved excessive budget as emergency funds for COVID-19 response efforts. Now, the healthcare professionals affected by the pandemic in any sort (lack of services, resources availability, etc.) can apply for assistance and compensate for their loss.

However, once they apply for these COVID-19 relief funds, the government bars them from sending out-of-pocket care expenses to corona patients. In simpler terms, as claimed by the HHS officials, this program exempts patients from surprise medical bills and supports the financial concerns of all stakeholders (physicians and patients).

Medical billing services of this day and age, in alignment with the program, have to work accordingly. Since they represent practices and their awareness matters, the peace of physicians and patients have to be their top priority.

Just a Reminder, What Are Surprise Medical Bills?

Surprise medical bills are where a patient has to pay the difference between what the insurance pays for them and what the actual charges are for services taken. For instance, if you went to see your doctor, and the care costs reach up to $100 while your insurance only covers $70, the difference, $30, is what you have to pay out of your pocket.

COVID-19 Funds – Terms of Use

In terms and conditions of the emergency relief fund of COVID-19, HHS established that they consider every patient a COVID affectee, whether it is a probable or an actual case. Hospitals and medical billing services have to sign a deal that would not charge out-of-pocket expenses from patients if their insurance plan does not include those services (a practice referred to as surprise billing).

The debate continues if the HHS has banned surprise bills, which was a primary cause of distress for patients and physicians. Because medical billing outsourcing companies often find it hard to collect additional charges from patients.

HHS states that they are trying to clarify terms, which will ultimately help in comprehending the implications of getting the COVID aid. For now, the surprise billing banning extends to only COVID-positive cases.

Healthcare leaders are also in confusion about the legal complications and challenges of the payment balancing. There is still a lot of clarity required to satisfy all queries.

Surprise Bills during Pandemic – The Role of Medical Billing Services

Apart from the HHS efforts, many states are coming forward with policies that prevent patients from surprise billing. It means it is time to consider patients with out-of-network healthcare plans as in-network patients.

It is a critical step toward balancing the shaky healthcare economy and stop the high consumption of resources. Besides, the instability in the healthcare ecosystem is making it nearly impossible to meet ends from patient and physician perspectives.

Medical billing services assist practices with payments in this regard. They also furnish weekly or monthly reports, as suited, to relieve physicians of any revenue stresses.

Surprise medical billing, Balance billing, Medical billing outsourcing companies, Medical billing companies

End

Physicians for fair coverage, the non-profit, have proposed a ban on surprise medical bills already. The government’s appropriate measures against surprise billing for COVID patients are incredible and in line with the aspirations of COVID affectees. We must continue this collective effort against balance billing, the goal of which is to attain peace of mind for our doctors and patients.

Via reducing or eliminating surprise bills, provided with a balanced financial solution for medical practices and medical billing services, can make up for lost revenues and maximize revenue opportunities.

What are your thoughts on this?