Posts

MIPS 2021, MIPS 2021 reporting, MIPS Qualified Registry, Quality Payment Program, MIPS Quality Measure, MIPS eligible clinician, MIPS 2021 quality reporting, healthcare provider, MIPS qualified clinicians, MIPS 2021 Qualified Registry, Electronic Health Records, Certified Electronic Health Record Technology, Promoting Interoperability, Merit based Incentive Payment System, pre-existing quality reporting programs, MIPS program, Electronic Prescribing

MIPS 2021: All About the Promoting Interoperability Measures

MIPS

MIPS (Merit-based Incentive Payment System) is a part of the Quality Payment Program (QPP), which came into effect in 2017. Its purpose was to move the Medicare part B providers to a performance-based payment system.

It replaced three pre-existing quality-reporting programs (PQRS, VBM, and MU) and made a single system with categories, based on which a score is determined called the MIPS composite or final score.

Categories

There are four categories in the MIPS program, which are

  1. Quality
  2. Improvements Activities (IA)
  3. Promoting Interoperability (PI)
  4. Cost

Each category makes up a certain percentage of the final score. And are responsible for determining how much of a positive payment adjustment a clinician will be receiving against the performance year. Moreover, the rules and regulations regarding each category change or get updated each year as well. It is the same case for MIPS 2021.

Today we will be focusing on the Promoting Interoperability (PI) category, its basics, and which requirements clinicians need to fulfill for successful MIPS 2021 reporting.

Promoting Interoperability (PI)

This category replaces the Medicare Electronic Health Records Incentive Program (EHR and Meaningful Use Program) and composes 25% of the final score.

It deals with patient engagement and the exchange of information through Certified Electronic Health Record Technology (CEHRT), in general.

Categories and Measures

There are 11 measures in this category, which are divided into four objectives or categories.

  1. Electronic Prescribing (e-prescribing)
  2. Provider to Patient Exchange
  3. Health Information Exchange
  4. Public Health and Clinical Data Exchange

Each of the chosen measures needs to be reported for 90 consecutive days, which can be done via a MIPS Qualified Registry.

E-prescribing 

This category consists of two measures.

It requires MIPS eligible clinicians to write at least one prescription and transmit it electronically through CEHRT.

This measure is worth 10 points.

  • Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP)

It is a bonus MIPS Quality Measure and does not need a mandatory attestation.

Moreover, it requires a MIPS eligible clinician to use data from CEHRT to examine PDMP for drug history regarding Schedule II opioids, following the applicable law.

There needs to be at least one Schedule II opioid prescribed electronically using CEHRT during the performance year to qualify for this.

It is worth 10 points. So, if you submit this measure with MIPS 2021 quality reporting data, you have a chance to gain high points in the MIPS PI category.

Provider to Patient Exchange

This category has one measure. In case you are not familiar with it, you can hire a third-party vendor, a MIPS Qualified Registry to submit their measures.

  • Provide Patients Access to their Healthcare Information

It requires the clinician to ensure that the patient or their representative has access to their health information. Including being able to transmit it, view it, and download it.

Any application or software can do this task. However, that tool is supposed to meet the Applications Programming Interface (API) specifications in the CEHRT.

It is worth 40 points in MIPS 2021 reporting.

Health Information Exchange

This category consists of three measures, which come as two options.

Option 1

  • Support Electronic Referral Loops by Submitting Health Information (Medical Records or Others) 

It requires the MIPS qualified clinicians to refer at least one of their patients to another healthcare provider. Including creating a summary of their care record using CEHRT and electronically exchanging it.

If submitted this MIPS quality measure, you can receive 20 points.

  • Support Electronic Referral Loops by Receiving & Reconciling Health Information

This requires the clinician to be the receiver of at least one electronic summary of a care record regarding patient encounters, including a transition of care record or a referral. Or it can be the acquisition and collection of information regarding a new patient, for reconciliation of information concerning medication, medical allergy, and current list of issues.

It is worth 20 points.

Option 2

  • Health Information Exchange (HIE) Bi-Directional Exchange

It requires MIPS-eligible clinicians for the bi-directional exchange of information with an HIE to support transitions of care and is worth 40 points.

You can choose to attest to either option as they both hold the same points. Moreover, it is up to you to go for MIPS 2021 reporting as an individual or via a MIPS Qualified Registry.

Public Health and Clinical Data Exchange

This MIPS quality category consists of five measures.

  • Immunization Reporting

It requires MIPS 2021 reporting clinicians to be in active engagement with a public health agency for the submission of immunization records and to receive immunization histories from the public health immunization registry or the immunization information system (IIS).

  • Syndromic Surveillance Reporting

For this measure, the MIPS eligible clinician needs to submit syndromic surveillance information with a public healthcare agency, preferably from an urgent care setting.

  • Electronic Case Reporting

It requires the clinician to actively engage with a healthcare agency to submit data regarding reportable cases.

  • Public Health Registry Reporting

For this, the clinician needs to be engaging with a public agency for information submitted to public health registries.

  • Clinical Data Registry Reporting

For this measure, the MIPS qualified clinician needs to actively be engaging with a clinical data registry for information submission.

You can choose any two measures out of the five listed here for reporting, and they will be worth 10 points in total.

Reporting and Submission Criteria

Clinicians can collect data for their respective measures and report it by using an Electronic Health Record (EHR) that meets the following criteria:

  1. Technology that meets the 2015 Edition certification criteria, or
  2. Technology that meets the 2015 Cures Update criteria, or
  3. A combination of both

You can ask your MIPS 2021 Qualified Registry in this regard.

Data collection for most measures from each objective takes place for a consecutive period of 90 days.

In addition to submitting the measures, clinicians also must provide their EHR’s CMS Identification Code. However, this code must come from the Certified Health IT Product List (CHPL) and then add a “yes” for each of the following:

  1. The Prevention of Information Blocking Attestation
  2. The ONC Direct Review Attestation
  3. The security risk analysis measure

The data for MIPS 2021 reporting regarding each measure can be submitted by:

  1. The clinicians
  2. a representative of a practice, a virtual group, or an APM Entity
  3. Third-party intermediaries as a Qualified Registry

Hardship Exceptions 

A clinician can apply for Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Hardship Exception in MIPS 2021 reporting. It allows them to not participate in activities from this category, which is permitted on the following grounds if you:

  1. Are MIPS eligible clinicians with a small practice
  2. Are a MIPS eligible clinician using a certified EHR Technology
  3. Have poor internet connectivity
  4. Are undergoing extreme and uncontrollable circumstances
  5. Lack of control over the availability of CEHRT

If your application is approved, then you will receive a 0% in the Promoting Interoperability category. Its 25% will get redistributed to another objective (or categories).

But, if you are a clinician with a special designation based on status (hospital-based) or type (physical therapist), you will not need to submit this application.

If you are a part of a group or a virtual group, all the clinicians included in the group will have to qualify for reweighing for the entire group to be reevaluated, unless they too have special status designations.

Conclusion

If you are a MIPS eligible clinician, this information will help you strategize better for the PI category. Assistance from a MIPS Qualified Registry will take all of your load to submit MIPS 2021 data timely to CMS.

You can learn more about the program here: https://p3healthcaresolutons.blogspot.com/2021/09/avoid-penalty-for-mips-2021.html

MIPS and MACRA, EHR technology, healthcare industry, healthcare provider, Healthcare clinical process, Medicare and Medicaid Services, value based healthcare

The Role Of Clinical Quality Measures For Physicians

Since the healthcare industry has taken serious measures to revamp healthcare services, the emphasis on incentive payment programs has increased. MIPS and MACRA, and more offer facilities to physicians that regular payment methods can never provide.

Such incentive payment programs come with various quality measures against which clinical data is needed to report. The number of clinical quality measures is so large that it is difficult to manage them for each healthcare provider. Moreover, the requirements for each program be it Meaningful Use (MU), MIPS, or others, and the implementation of reporting criteria can be quite confusing.

The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) states Clinical Quality Measures (CQMs) for incentive payment programs. The result is not just to pay physicians but the value-based healthcare improvement efforts. These clinical quality measures also put their part in various government or private development projects.

Need of CQMs

Eligible physicians and hospitals submit data to CMS as in MIPS. In return, CMS estimates their performance and reward accordingly while checking that patients are getting the deserved attention from physicians. In addition, it works in favor of the healthcare industry to improve performance categories, falling short in terms of efficiency and quality.

What factors determine success in Clinical Quality Measures Submission?

As per the CMS website, it checks the following parameters to score CQMs.

  1. Use of available resources
  2. Compatibility to healthcare standards
  3. Healthcare outcomes
  4. Patient’s safety and welfare
  5. Coordination among physicians
  6. Patient’s engagement level
  7. Population & overall health standard
  8. Healthcare clinical processes

To maintain the accuracy and transparency in the healthcare system, ONC, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (US Government Health and Human Services), monitors the use of EHR and other technologies.

The Development Process of Clinical Quality Measures (CQMs)

MIPS and MACRA, EHR technology, healthcare industry, healthcare provider, Healthcare clinical process, Medicare and Medicaid Services, value based healthcare

National Quality Forum

Many healthcare industry leaders and stakeholders take part in developing CQMs. However, measures standardized by the National Quality Forum (NQF) are considered as the top priority. Most of the incentive payment programs use their measures because their development process involves extensive research.

Another reason for adopting NQF quality measures is their work and objectives that match with that of CMS. Moreover, their initiative boosts the use of electronic healthcare records (EHRs).

Development Process via CMS

CMS also has its own measure development project known as The Measures Management system. This system is always in its evolution stage and sets values for business processes. The deduced measures also support MIPS and other incentive payment programs and provide an opportunity for their growth.

Real-Life Implementation of Quality Measures

Clinical quality measure reporting accounts for many uses, but its major reliance is on EHR technology usage or Meaningful Use. However, many healthcare providers deem Meaningful Use to be stressful and demanding. Moreover, not every quality measure is for everyone. Thus, there should be some flexibility in the reporting criteria.

CMS has gone to great lengths to overcome reporting issues and streamlined measures under seven categories.  When physicians are reimbursed and incentivized, it becomes obligatory for them to maintain their performance instead of giving quality as a one-time shot.

Clinical quality measures are also a great aspect of the Physicians’ Quality Reporting System. Physicians are met with penalties when they don’t report according to the standards.

Thus, MIPS, MACRA, and other payment incentive programs can’t perform their actual functions without efficient marking of clinical quality measures. The key to success is the selection of accurate measures according to the practice and the value-based approach of practicing physicians towards patients.