MACRA MIPS (The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 – Merit-based Incentive Payment System) is a program that caters to physician finances under Medicare. Not only that, but it determines the quality of care within hospitals, practices, and clinics should meet certain standards.
The program is now in its fifth year (started back in 2017) and it would be right to say that it facilitates the whole physician reimbursement process. MIPS 2020 submission is not rocket science; however, it requires a certain skill set to achieve good scores.
Key Elements of QPP MIPS
MIPS program has four categories that cater to meaningful quality healthcare services.
- Improvement Activities (IA)
- Promoting Interoperability (PI)
The quality category replaced the PQRS (Physician Quality Reporting System) and reflects the efforts to improve the quality of care.
Improvement activities translate patient convenience and satisfaction in quality healthcare delivery.
Promoting Interoperability replaced Advancing Care Information (previously known as the meaningful use program) to integrate technology in healthcare.
The cost category replaced the value-based modifier program and translates the efficiency of the cost factor.
Each category has different weights. The respective percentages change each year under MACRA MIPS. Eligible clinicians, who exceed the minimum performance threshold get positive payment adjustments and avoid a penalty of a certain percentage.
MIPS Full Form in Healthcare
Large medical practices already know the implications of MIPS data reporting. However, it is small healthcare organizations or non-eligible clinicians that need to understand MACRA MIPS to the core.
Now, the performance bar has gotten high. Although CMS (The Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services) facilitates small/rural/underprivileged medical practices to much extent, the appropriate approach is to consult a MIPS Qualified Registry for MIPS solutions.
What Physicians Can Get from MIPS Reporting?
There are many advantages that eligible physicians can get by submitting data to CMS under MACRA MIPS.
- Physicians get to improve care quality.
- They can improve ranking among fellow physicians via the Physician Compare portal, thus, improves patient rate.
- Against the exceptional performance, physicians can receive incentives.
- High achievers can even receive a share from the $500 million bonus pool.
However, MACRA MIPS requires consistent efforts, but practices could get help from MIPS consultants to guide them through the process. In case you are one of the practices with pending MIPS 2020 reporting, there is still time for you to submit until March 31, 2021.
Should Physicians Report Data Despite Corona Pandemic?
There are lots of benefits if MIPS eligible clinicians choose to report data despite hardships.
For instance, MIPS incentives and bonus pool worth $500 million are worth a try, and reputation on Physician’s Portal can help to improve patients’ volume. However, it all depends on how individual clinicians, groups, and virtual groups, report data to CMS.
The first rule is to deeply analyze your strengths and select MIPS Quality Measures that are most suitable for the medical practice. The more specialty-specific measures you report, the more chances you have for maximum points. Consequently, a smooth revenue cycle management is what you all get at the end of the reporting period.
How to Report MIPS Data?
Eligible clinicians can choose different ways to report MACRA MIPS. However, the easiest and comprehensive way is to report data via the MIPS Qualified Registry as P3Care.
We choose specialty-specific measures to submit data from the list as per the final rule proposed by CMS.
MIPS data submission under MACRA is a lot to take in, but as the years went by, it is in the best interests of physicians to attest to the quality payment program.
Especially with COVID, clinicians have lost millions of bucks to cater to the surge of patients. In such times, incentive payment programs are a ray of hope as they facilitate in many ways. Moreover, CMS also offered flexibility in the administrative load. So, there is no point in avoiding participation in such programs, right?